Built inside ACI and UNICEF Finland’s multi-party initiative — a structure in operation, not a pilot.
Three structural problems keep good work from becoming real impact — and no strategy deck or reporting tool alone fixes them.
The good work is happening, but it’s fragmented, unmeasured, and impossible to show to a board or a partner.
People want meaning in their work, but they can’t see where their contribution lands — so engagement fades.
Social responsibility is reported next to the strategy rather than owned as part of it, so it never compounds.
Most consulting stops at strategy and reporting. ESG platforms give visibility without expertise. We’re the only offering that combines all three.
Without TACI, advisory work fades when the engagement ends. With TACI, the impact keeps compounding.
Clients enter at the level that matches their ambition — and the journey is designed so each stage makes the next both more possible and more compelling.
The platform is Tier 1 — the door in, not the whole house. TACI makes each stage possible; the advisory makes each stage meaningful.
What changes at each stage — the arc most clients travel as ambition and capability build.
Data that was fragmented becomes visible. Employees see where their contribution lands. Leadership has the evidence to make the case.
Leadership owns it. Employees are activated. Partners chosen deliberately. KPIs aligned with business priorities. TACI fully embedded.
You convene others, share the platform, and drive impact that compounds across a community. The collective is the advantage.
TACI makes each stage possible. The advisory makes each stage meaningful.
Many organisations, many kinds of contribution, one balance sheet.
The CIBS brings an initiative’s whole capital into one view: who contributed what, in what form, and what it produced. It is the initiative’s financial statement — not a report for the funder, but a shared picture of where things stand.
Partners’ free-form updates become structured data without anyone filling in the same form twice.
Every figure in a report traces back to its source sentence. Click a figure: you see the original text, the date, and who confirmed it.
Click any figure to see its source.
The machine proposes an extraction; a person confirms it. No figure reaches a report without a named person approving it.
The same indicator means the same thing regardless of who reports it. Definitions are agreed once and they hold.
Extraction is AI-assisted. That is marked at every point where it is used.
TACI does not claim an indicator is an ESRS data point. It marks the relationship — exact, subset, broader, or related — and how confident that mapping is.
If you are producing your own organisation’s mandatory sustainability report, you need a different tool for that. TACI answers a different question: what did you and your partners achieve together, and does the answer hold up.
Hosted in the EU, GDPR in the structure, three languages — Finnish, Swedish and English — and CSRD/ESRS vocabulary as a given. Not retrofitted; the starting point.
Each seat asks a different question. The same balance sheet answers all six.
The UN Global Compact’s 2026–2030 strategy is anchored in three priorities: equipping companies to act, catalyzing collective action, and advancing the business case.
Associations reported in a review of 640 studies where sustainability is managed as a strategic business capability. Third-party research — shown as external findings, not TACI’s own results.
45 minutes, no pitch. We walk through your initiative’s structure and see whether TACI fits.